Friday, March 25, 2011

Forever and ever and EVER...

Forever is a long time.  Can’t-wrap-my-head-around-it long time.  What will it be like?  What will we do?
The way I always thought, and I think most Followers are with me, is that once we die, we either go to Heaven or Hell- forever.  And Hell sucks and Heaven is like being in church all of the time.  Now, don’t get me wrong- I like going to church.  But a church service that never ends?  Eh... I don’t really know if I can handle that.  So I always just kind of wrote it off as ‘Things will be different in Heaven- being in God’s presence... I’ll want different things.  Right?’  Not really that comforting, but the best I could do.
Enter ‘Love Wins.’  (And yes, I’m going to spend a lot of time on this book, because I’m trying to process everything it said and it might just take some time...)
First- the concept of ‘forever.’  Rob (I’m going to talk about him like we’re friends) goes into great detail about the Greek word ‘aion.’  Now, he doesn’t mention where in Scripture this word is used, but he describes this word as meaning ‘age.’  Not so much a precise amount of time, but more a period or era of time.  So, it doesn’t mean ‘forever’ like we think of forever.  He says ‘The first meaning of this word...refers to a period of time with a beginning and an end.’ (Chapter 2)
To Quote:
So according to Jesus there is this age, this aion-
the one they, and we, are living in-
and then a coming age, 
also called ‘the world to come’
or simply ‘eternal life.’
The second possible definition he gives ‘aion’ is something akin to an intensity of experience that transcends time- ‘That took FOREVER...’ or ‘Time flies’ something so intense that time ceases to matter.
Ultimately, Rob tells us, the people Jesus was speaking to didn’t think of forever the way we think of forever.
This is really important.  So, of course, I decided to look into it for myself.  That’s the responsible thing to do, right?  I mean, this guy is kind of flying in the face of everything we’ve been taught for as long as we can remember- surely he’s making it up, right?
First- the easy one- I went to the IVP Bible Background Commentary.  It says that ‘in Jewish texts, the term literally means the life of the world to come...some [NT] passages speak of it as a present as well as a future gift, because Jesus’ resurrection has inaugurated salvation for the present.’ (pg 824)
Then I went around on the internet and searched ‘greek aion.’  What I didn’t think about, and it’s so obvious now that I’ve seen it, is this is the root for our word ‘eon.’  Which isn’t actually eternal.  Not proof, but something to think about.
Here’s something I found on a website:
The Greek form for "everlasting punishment" in Matthew 25:46 is "kolasin aionion." Kolasin is a noun in the accusative form, singular voice, feminine gender and means "punishment, chastening, correction, to cut-off as in pruning a tree to bare more fruit." "Aionion" is the adjective form of "aion," in the singular form and means "pertaining to an eon or age, an indeterminate period of time." (Note: the two words in many, not all translations become reversed changing the Greek into English.)
"Aionion," as shown above, is the singular form of the adjective of the Greek noun "aion." Many people unfamiliar with the Greek do not realize that the endings of the same word change (inflection) to indicate its mood, case, gender, etc. Therefore, "aionion" may appear with different endings. "Aionion, aioniou, aionios," for example, are all different inflections of the adjective form of the noun "aion."
The noun "aion" in Greek literature has always meant "an indeterminate period of time. It could be as short as the time Jonah spent in the belly of a fish (three days or nights), the length of a man's life, or as long as a very long age.
Of course, the website was www.tentmaker.org- not really something that inspires a lot of confidence.
So I broke out the big guns (at least the biggest guns I have at my disposal): Dictionary of Paul and his Letters, Dictionary of Jesus and the Gospels, Cleon Morris (you language students know what I’m talking about:), and Kittel.  Oh yeah- and BAGD.  
Have I told you my husband has a pretty great library?
Here’s what I found (and I’m going to warn you now, I feel no compulsion to use MLA or Chicago-style footnotes):
Cleon: The adjective ‘eternal’ literally means age-long and everything depends on the length of the age.  In the NT there is never a hint that the coming age has an end (ref 2 Thess 1:9, page 483); Eternal life contains a temporal reference but stresses the qualitative reference.  It refers to the Jewish concept of life in the age to come (ref Matt 19:16, page 43); Eternal life is the life of the age to come which is gained by faith, cannot be destroyed, and is a present possession of the one who believes (ref John 3:15, page 185)
Dictionary of Jesus and the Gospels: Said a lot.  I’m not going to type it out, but basically said that the believer’s eternal life starts now and continues in the age to come (pg 380-381)
Dictionary of Paul and his Letters:  [Eternal life is used as] qualitatively different from life as it is presently known, a life bestowed by God as part of the age to come (page 554).  So then I went back to Cleon and looked up Romans 5:21 and this is what he had to say about its usage there- ‘Eternal life is not only related to the future, but is organically related to the actual life lived and is a present possession of the believer (pg 326)
BAGD: Listed four possible meanings for ‘aion’ and three more for ‘aionios’ (page 27)
‘aion’- a very long time, eternity (of time gone by, of time to come); a segment of time, age (present age, nearing its end or the age to come, the Messianic period); the world as a spacial concept; the Aeon as a person (Hellenistic deity worshipped originally in Alexandria)
‘aionios’- without beginning (long ages ago), without beginning or end- of God
Kittel: Plato used it in reference to timeless, ideal eternity.  Aristotle used it to refer to a relative period of time allotted to each specific thing. It talks about a couple of different meanings, but says that it is only in the light of context that we find out if it is referring to eternity in the strict sense or simply ‘remote’ or ‘extended’ or ‘uninterrupted time’ - and even then it is difficult to know (pg 198-199, vol 1).  
Kittel said a lot of other things, but by then my head had begun to throb, so I decided that was enough.
Conclusion time:  Does the Greek really refer to ‘eternity’ the way we think of it, or are there nuances there that we don’t see in English translation?
Based on my extremely limited research, I think the answer is yes.  I didn’t find anything about the intensity of feeling thing, but I’m not going to write off the possibility based on one Thursday night’s worth of research.  The rest seems plausible, though not certain.  
What I think is most interesting, though, is the recurrence of words like ‘qualitative’ and ‘present possession’ in reference to eternal life.
Which brings us back to the book.
To Quote:
Our eschatology shapes our ethics.
Eschatology is about last things.
Ethics are about how you live.
What you believe about the future shapes, informs, and determines how you live now.
This definitely took a turn I wasn’t looking for, but what if thinking in terms of ‘What will heaven be like?’ is completely missing the point?  
What if this life was the beginning of whatever ‘eternal life’ is?  
What would that change?
I think it means we might have the power to bring heaven here.  If we are living a qualitatively different life now, instead of looking for it to start after we die, what does that mean?
It means restoration. 
It means being made new.
It means seeing the world through new eyes.
If Heaven is where God’s will is done, and we are living a life in pursuit of God’s will- being constantly renewed by His Spirit, taken from glory to glory- doesn’t that mean that Heaven starts here, now?
What does that mean?

Friday, March 18, 2011

The Beginning

Bonnie and Hero.  You might be wondering why I decided that should be the name of my blog.  In truth, I wonder why I even have a blog.  So, we'll have to work our way through the events of the past week to really understand why I'm taking up space in the blogosphere.

There is this book.  Well, there are a couple of books.  The first one for me was CS Lewis's 'The Great Divorce.'  Most people like CS Lewis- I mean, this guy gave us Aslan and Narnia, right?  Well, in 'The Great Divorce,' he postulates, via allegory, about Heaven and Hell. At its most simple (and this is a really stripped down version), Lewis says something to the effect that Heaven and Hell are a choice, and the people in Hell are free to leave, and are only still there because they choose to stay.  Now, there is a lot to that.  Lewis is not negating the power of the Cross, nor is he negating the real need to become a new creature in Christ.  The real magic of the book is the idea that the power of the Cross does not end at death.

Very short sum-up.

Ok.  So, this week.  There is this book.  It's called 'Love Wins: Heaven, Hell, and the Fate of Everyone Who Ever Lived.'  It's written by a guy named Rob Bell, who happens to be a heck of a teacher and a controversial one at that.  I like him.  He challenging.  Well, before this book came out, a friend of mine started posting things about how this proved that Rob Bell was a false teacher and a universalist (all roads lead to God).  Before the book came out.  Based entirely on reviews and blogs by people who hadn't read the book.

Now, I'm the kind of person who always wants to defend, even if I don't like what I'm defending, so of course I took issue with that.  To call someone a false teacher is a BIG DEAL.  Huge.  Gigantic.  To do so with no basis and with some kind of glee is... tragic.

Fast forward to March 15- the release of the book.  Of course I bought it.  I would have gotten it anyway- I have all of his other books.

It rocked my world.

To the core.

And when I say it rocked my world, I'm talking major worldview shift.

Does that mean I agreed with everything he said?  No.  I need to do my own research and check things out.  But I prayed the whole week before I read the book and while I read the book and the only thing I felt?  Excitement.  This book- the ideas inside- are exciting.


What if going to Heaven isn't the point?


What if the new and eternal life we are promised, the Heaven that we're promised, started right NOW?


What if the power of the Cross has power... even after death?


This book is not a book of universalism.  Jesus is the Way, the Truth, and the Life.

This is not a 'Man-Centered' theology.  That's too small.  Too... well, not enough.

It's a 'God Centered' theology.  God does what He does because of who He is, not because of who we are or what we do.  It's ALL about Him.

But we can still choose.  It's not real love if we don't.  So we can have all the hell we want, and it starts here, not there.  And God will give us all the hell we want, until we're ready and able to accept His love and His grace and allow Him to make us new creations.

I'm probably not doing it justice, but that's kind of the gist.  It's exciting.

But it's not... traditional.

And therein lies the problem.  Some people are frighted of something this life altering.  Others claim that all they need is the Bible for solid theology (as though it were written outside of the matrix of time and culture), so what it says is what it says is what it says.  Some people are so convinced of their rightness, that they are immediately irate at the idea that someone would propose something else.  As if anyone had the corner on the 'right' market.

So the same people who revere Lewis are crucifying Bell.  Does anyone else see the contradiction here?

Don't get me wrong- it's ok to not agree.  VERY OK.  And here we come to the inspiration for this blog.     I got into some rather heated discussions with people whom I know love Jesus that ended with my basically being called a moron and being told I have a 'man-centered' theology and don't adhere to Scripture.  Of course, this was extremely hurtful because I have based everything I am and believe on what I understand Scripture to say.  I went to college to learn more about it and do my best to truly read what the Text is saying.  The thing was, these people weren't even really listening to me.  They just wanted to be angry and to cling to what they KNEW was truth.

Now again, these people love Jesus and I know that.  They are just passionate, and sometimes passion gets the better of us.  Can make us a little ungracious.

Anyway- the blog.  The idea here is to create a place where I can write out what I'm processing and place it before you so that we can discuss.  There is wisdom in a multitude of counselors- maybe you will think of something that I will not.  Maybe I'll come up with an idea that is so wide of the mark it's funny, and you can call me on it.  Or maybe I will think of something you won't.  The idea is to grow, and to do so with friends.

And so here are the rules for the blog:

Feel free to disagree.  But please, be nice.

If you are not a follower of the Way, please, feel free to enjoy, interact, and engage.

Why Bonnie and Hero?  When Justin and I first started dating, I wrote him stories.  The characters' names were Bonnie and Hero.  Those stories were about a great journey- an adventure.  They're also the reason he fell in love with me.

Let this adventure begin.  (And no, I don't expect you to fall in love with me:)